Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots. ha

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots. ha

    This stunt is pretty disgraceful, but this was a nice article on it.

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (CNN) -- "We are on the right side of history! We are on the side of individual freedoms and liberties and, dammit, we will reclaim the civil rights moment. We will take that movement -- because we were the people who did it in the first place." -- Glenn Beck, on his nationally syndicated radio program, May 26.

    It is Glenn Beck's most audacious stunt yet: This Saturday, in the company of former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, the National Rifle Association and others, the Fox News Channel host will stand in the sacred shadow not just of the Lincoln Memorial but of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. himself, near the spot where King delivered his "I Have a Dream" speech 47 years earlier to the exact day.

    During this event -- billed as "Restoring Honor" -- Beck will aim to "reclaim the civil rights moment" for his cause, and in the process he will continue what he's been doing for the last 18 months: bending the history of 20th-century America like a Philadelphia soft pretzel.

    The revisionist message behind "Restoring Honor" is nothing new for the conservative shock jock. In the year and half since President Obama took office, Beck has led his loyal followers on a journey not just to "reclaim" civil rights but much more audaciously to rewrite the sweeping narrative arc of American history from the time of the Founding Fathers forward.

    iReport: Warning to Tea Party members coming to D.C.

    The backbone of the Tea Party is over-55s and especially retirees -- some planned, some forced -- with the most valuable asset of all, time.

    They see studying U.S. history as a powerful reconnection with their youth. Waiting for Beck's "American Revival" show in Orlando, Florida, in March, 70-year-old fan Joseph Cerniglia told me he was way too busy for civics lessons when he was raising kids and working as a stockbroker and then cider-maker. "I have learned more from Glenn Beck -- learned more about American history and government, from Glenn Beck -- than in the previous 40 years of my life," the retiree told me.

    For thousands of followers such as Cerniglia, there is a genuine desire to relearn American history. The only problem is that what they're learning is bunk. It's not history as it happened, but rather a Beck-scripted, Tea Party rewrite of history that demonizes Obama, Democrats and progressive activists.

    In this alternate reality version of the past, the 20th century's heroic battles over equal rights for racial and ethnic minorities, women and homosexuals are recast as a march toward socialism and away from the Founding Fathers. Meanwhile, flawed progressive Woodrow Wilson and even Teddy Roosevelt become America's Lenin and Trotsky while it is the pre-Depression-era Calvin Coolidge who belongs on Mount Rushmore.

    More recently, Beck has featured on Fox, at several well-attended "American Revivals" and on his web-based "university" a new right-hand man -- David Barton, a key figure in the recent right-wing rewrite of Texas school textbooks -- to teach his viewers the much-debunked idea that America's creation was rooted in Christianity.

    Barton's machine-gun-paced spewing of 18th-century God references and black-robed revolutionary preachers gives less than short shrift to the real achievement of the Founders in separating church and state. In April, Barton told Beck's 3 million TV viewers that "we use the Ten Commandments as basis of civil law and the Western world [and it] has been for 2,000 years."

    The results of this re-education campaign have been nothing short of phenomenal. A mere on-air endorsement by Beck of any obscure book -- such as "Sacred Fire," on the spirituality of George Washington -- will propel it to the best-seller list. Now, thousands of fans have signed up for a paid "insider" package that includes an online Glenn Beck University with lectures by Barton and others.

    But pseudo-history is having a real impact on current events. In Texas, the new school curriculum downgrades democracy-minded Thomas Jefferson as well as 1960s civil rights. In the political arena, some activists are pushing to repeal the 17th Amendment that allows people to elect U.S. senators directly -- largely because the measure was enacted during Wilson's progressive era.

    While all these histories are too important to lose to revisionism, none represents more of a risk than the civil rights era. In 1963, King understood that his dream of equal rights for black Americans would never happen without intervention from the federal government, a concept that's such an anathema to the Tea Partiers, the Beck-sponsored 9/12 movement and the other right-wing radicals who'll occupy the Mall this Saturday.

    Famously, King lashed out at the Alabama governor -- George Wallace -- who had "his lips dripping with the words of 'interposition' and 'nullification' " -- a reference to claims by Wallace and other segregationists that states' rights trumped the power of Washington to promote integration.

    Yet these two maligned principles are exactly what the Tea Party wants their red-state governors to do to block health care reform and other major federal initiatives of the first black president. This contradiction is lost on the Tea Partiers, and if the recent past is prologue, such facts will matter little to the mass of people who've risen up in the backlash against the Obama presidency.

    Most moderates and liberals aren't even aware that this Hollywood-size script doctoring of U.S. history is taking place -- and the political consequences may be enormous. George Orwell wrote that "who controls the past ... controls the future." Beck and his fans may reclaim a lot more than the legacy of 1960s civil rights this weekend -- unless America's too silent majority is finally ready to start fighting back for our past.

    http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/08/2...ory/index.html

  2. #2
    Inactive Member centennialdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2003
    Posts
    3,263
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    Why is it disgraceful? He isn't doing anything more than what other civil rights people are doing now days. Everyone, including Beck, Maddow, Behar, O'Reilly, or whoever it is will use whatever mean at their disposal to get their Message across to the people. Just because his views are different does not make it disgraceful.

    Obama even uses scare tactics and out of hand dismissals of others when it suits his agenda. Any politician, new anchor, or talk show host does.

    Even CNN gets it wrong sometimes.

  3. #3
    Inactive Member TheBeast's Avatar
    Join Date
    January 24th, 2004
    Posts
    4,351
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    I guess they just didn't see the point in mentioning that one of the featured speakers at the rally is Dr. Alveda King.
    [COLOR="Lime"][SIZE="6"][FONT="Century Gothic"]CREAG AN TUIRC[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR]
    [img]http://i11.photobucket.com/albums/a183/mm38nut/thkfc.gif[/img]

  4. #4
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    Quote Originally Posted by centennialdawg View Post
    Why is it disgraceful? He isn't doing anything more than what other civil rights people are doing now days. Everyone, including Beck, Maddow, Behar, O'Reilly, or whoever it is will use whatever mean at their disposal to get their Message across to the people. Just because his views are different does not make it disgraceful.

    Obama even uses scare tactics and out of hand dismissals of others when it suits his agenda. Any politician, new anchor, or talk show host does.

    Even CNN gets it wrong sometimes.

    Beck is a lunatic, liar, manipulator, conspiracy theory nut-job...he's called Obama a racist and mocks his 11 year old daughter, I'm sure this is exactly who Dr King would have wanted to be speaking. He's hijacked an american hero to spew his ignorance, it's not just disgraceful, it's disgusting. O'Reilly isn't nearly as bad as Beck, I don't how behar get's into the mix of political commentator and Maddow doesn't doesn't, nor would ever done anything like this - she leans left of course, but doesn't lie or mislead, incredibly smart and extremely informative. What little that is incorrect on her show, is made mention and corrected in a following episode.


    Quote Originally Posted by TheBeast View Post
    I guess they just didn't see the point in mentioning that one of the featured speakers at the rally is Dr. Alveda King.
    You mean the same Alveda King who is a member of a conservative think-tank, endorsed John McCain, spoke against Obama and is about as far right as Beck? Oh yes, wonder why she wasn't mentioned? lmao. Because she happens to be the niece of King, doesn't mean she represents him.

  5. #5
    Inactive Member centennialdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2003
    Posts
    3,263
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    Obama is a racist at heart. King is not a hero, he was just a man with a message. A message that was heard by all people then. But then, King was motivated by the times and then was considered a fanatic and troublemaker by most. Most notably, by Malcolm X. They hated each other.

    Beck is doing nothing more than what King did when he was around. King was labeled a racist then, too.

    And I think that you must harbor some animosity toward Beck over his choice of venues: In front of the Lincoln Memorial.

    Just because Beck is white is the only reason these reporters are labeling him a racist and liar. If Beck had been black, or any other color, then this "rally" wouldn't even be mentioned.

  6. #6
    Inactive Member Milk3's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 9th, 2008
    Posts
    2,212
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    Quote Originally Posted by centennialdawg View Post
    Just because Beck is white is the only reason these reporters are labeling him a racist and liar. If Beck had been black, or any other color, then this "rally" wouldn't even be mentioned.
    Which is sad. Racism is wrong no matter what. There's racism towards whites also but no one ever admits to that.
    [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/MattMan7/redskins3.jpg[/img]
    [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/MattMan7/6a00d83451ba6469e200e54f0eaffb8833-.gif[/img]
    [img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v664/MattMan7/unc1-1.jpg[/img]

  7. #7
    Inactive Member centennialdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2003
    Posts
    3,263
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    Quote Originally Posted by Milk3 View Post
    Which is sad. Racism is wrong no matter what. There's racism towards whites also but no one ever admits to that.
    That is because it is not "politically correct" to talk about reverse racism.

  8. #8
    Inactive Member R13's Avatar
    Join Date
    September 25th, 2007
    Posts
    10,269
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    Quote Originally Posted by centennialdawg View Post
    Obama is a racist at heart. King is not a hero, he was just a man with a message. A message that was heard by all people then. But then, King was motivated by the times and then was considered a fanatic and troublemaker by most. Most notably, by Malcolm X. They hated each other.

    Beck is doing nothing more than what King did when he was around. King was labeled a racist then, too.

    And I think that you must harbor some animosity toward Beck over his choice of venues: In front of the Lincoln Memorial.

    Just because Beck is white is the only reason these reporters are labeling him a racist and liar. If Beck had been black, or any other color, then this "rally" wouldn't even be mentioned.
    Ha and you're as looney as him, we're talking about the same Obama who's mother is white and was raised by his white grandparents. What has he done and why would you ever think he's a "racist at heart"? Love to hear this. And yes King was, he stood up for what he knew was right with everything against him and changed the world - well had a major hand in it. He wasn't considered a "trouble-maker by most", by white southernors basically, but far from most and Malcolm sure didn't think that, he thought he wasn't radical at all. They didn't hate each other, they strongly disagreed about the methods of the movement, and during X's earlier years he was spoke against King's method pretty harshly...but X cooled down a lot after he came back from Mecca and King spoke very highly of him when he was shot.

    Are you serious right now? Did you really just say Beck is doing what King did? Wow. On what planet is Glenn Beck ever doing anything close to what King did? Never called him a racist, I called him unatic, liar, manipulator, conspiracy theory nut-job. The man is unstable, seriously.

    His "views" are insane and not just his choice of venue, but on the anniversary of King's "I have a Dream" speech, at the very location and same steps. The guy says he's going to "reclaim the civil rights movement" for his own movement, in front of a group of people that doesn't have a good track record recently of racism and that 47 years ago, King would have been criticizing.

    No, it's because he's Glenn Beck, whites have spoken there before and there will be other whites there...no one cares. You have him, Palin and the NRA...plus the David Barton guy...

    "David Barton, a key figure in the recent right-wing rewrite of Texas school textbooks -- to teach his viewers the much-debunked idea that America's creation was rooted in Christianity."

    You realize what they tried to rewrite about slavery and the civil rights movement in that book? Just leave things like that out or dress them up. If a black held these same extreme, idiotic views and what he represents...it would be criticized just as much. Though I didn't see in the article where he was called a racist or anything close, just a nut-job and how ironic of what he represents and holding his "rally" on those steps, on that day. It's disgusting.

  9. #9
    Inactive Member centennialdawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    June 10th, 2003
    Posts
    3,263
    Follows
    0
    Following
    0
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quoted
    0 Post(s)

    Re: Beck trying to bring Civil Rights movement back to it's white, conseravtive roots

    I might make a very strong suggestion to you r13 to edit the Looney part out about me. You don't know me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •